Where is the “good” art?
What is the “good” art?
Art is bad if not well executed.
What is well executed art?

Well executed art is a brilliant, more importantly ‘authentic’ processing of data into a presentable artistically classified, or unclassified, form of expression. Therefore, it’s “art”.

“Good” art can be entirely separate of any preconceived notions of a “talented” execution.

Thus, “untalented” art can be just as significant, if not more significant, than “talented” art.

The merit then lies in authenticity, supplemented then by the more abstract means of expression.

The person that cannot “draw a lick”, instead doodles a ridiculous series of lines and scribbles, presents it in media set to a decorative piano piece, correlating it to an abstract, yet meaningful, title, or series of subtitles, can therefore be an artist and therefore has created “art”.

A person that views this piece, emulates it to a tee, is motivated by “wanting to create art”, is informed by the surface of the previous work, and finally creates something with seemingly more “talent” involved, is not an artist. Thus, has not created “art”.

Art is elusive. If someone has created art, and is therefore an artist, it might very well be as much of a surprise by them than by anyone else.

No one is quantifiably an artist. 

Everyone is an artist.